Pricing
M
Matt Fager
The decision to price per identity, when the product seems to be tenant-focused, is one I don't quite understand.
I understand it from a business perspective, but I don't understand the philosophy that managing policies for a tenant with 100 users is somehow 100X more difficult to manage than a tenant with 1 user.
I would love to understand the logic or the level of overhead that more users create for a system that ensures best practices are deployed and stay deployed.
S
Stevez Gomes
Totally agree. I am on the fence at the moment based on the current pricing model. Flat fee per tenant is a much more practical and fair pricing model for this particular module.
J
Jason Karwacki
Agreed here as well, not sure why it's at the user level, when it's all about tenant level policies.
C
Corey DeGrandchamp
Agreed here - this product is a non-starter for us due to the way its priced.
P
Paul Rose
Yes - polices are per tenant, pricing per tenant makes a lot more sense - and this is for many icing on a cake we bake daily ie we alreandy manage these per tenant, most polices if not all are already in place, it makes it more convenient, but not in it's current form, and not at anywhere near the proposed cost - maybe $20/tenant per month... this is a great cherry to existing Huntress products but IMO does not have the value many of the other Huntrss offerings bring to the table which cannot be self managed like policy can.